Read 00-model-contracts.md before using these specifications. References refer to 09-literature.md. All proposed Lean declarations and solver bridges remain to be implemented.
Contents
- State, scales, and units
- Ideal MHD
- Static equilibria and boundary conditions
- Weak and stepped-pressure equilibria
- Beyond ideal MHD
- Kinetic reference and reduction contracts
- Theorem backlog
State, scales, and units
Keep mass density ρ, number density nₛ, pressure p, temperature Tₛ, magnetic field B, current J, and fluid velocity u distinct. For a Maxwellian isotropic mixture use a specified equation of state
If temperature is supplied as energy in keV, write pₛ = nₛ Θₛ with Θₛ = k_B Tₛ and perform the energy-to-joule conversion. Do not silently insert keV values into a kelvin formula.
Introduce reference scales L₀, B₀, ρ₀ and derive the nondimensional equations. Track at least
and collision, resistive, thermal, orbit, and operating timescales. The thermal-speed convention is explicitly v_th = √(2Θ/m). A model-validity interface should record the ordering parameters rather than treating “small” as a theorem.
For realistic case studies, import a documented experimental or reactor operating profile together with its geometry; use W7-X transport data or the HELIAS engineering study as entry points. Neither provides a universal minimum field, coil spacing, or material lifetime.
Ideal MHD
For a smooth isotropic adiabatic fluid without gravity, heating, or resistivity:
Equivalently, D_t(pρ^{-Γ})=0 where ρ>0. Define solutions with a declared time interval, regularity, initial data, and boundary conditions. The source model Freidberg, Ideal MHD supplies the physical assumptions and variants.
First prove:
div Bremains zero becausediv curl=0, in the chosen classical solution class.- Mass is conserved on a fixed impermeable boundary
u·n=0. - For the appropriate closed conducting boundary, total energy
is conserved; retain boundary fluxes in the general identity.
- Smooth material magnetic flux is conserved under the ideal induction equation, with a proved flow map.
- Positive initial density stays positive along a sufficiently regular flow for the existence interval.
Conservation identities alone do not establish global smooth existence or nonlinear stability in a strong norm.
Static equilibria and boundary conditions
For u=0, isotropic static equilibrium means
Specify whether profiles, total currents, fluxes, helicity, or boundary shape are prescribed. Density is not determined by force balance alone; it enters stability through inertia and the operating model.
Fixed boundary. Require an appropriate magnetic boundary, often B·n=0. Initially analyze perturbations with zero boundary trace; later extend to the chosen conducting-wall condition.
Free plasma–vacuum interface. Include a vacuum region, its magnetic field, and coil/external wall boundary data. For an ideal magnetic interface B·n=0 on both sides with no additional imposed traction, require continuity of total pressure:
Use normal-field continuity, tangential jump/current conditions, and the full stress formulation for more general interfaces. An equilibrium computed with a fixed plasma boundary does not supply a free-boundary stability certificate.
Vacuum. J=0 gives curl B=0, in addition to div B=0. On a simply connected region with sufficient regularity, a scalar-potential theorem gives B=∇Φ and ΔΦ=0. On a toroidal region retain harmonic/circulation components.
Force-free. Constant pressure permits J∥B where B≠0. A useful exact counterexample to “zero pressure implies vacuum” uses B₀,L₀>0 on a Cartesian domain periodic in z with period 2πL₀:
This model has nonzero current and zero Lorentz force, with explicit field and length scales preserving SI dimensions. It is a kernel sanity witness, not a stellarator reactor.
Axisymmetry. With cylindrical coordinates and a selected poloidal flux convention,
Prove this reduction on R>0 and track the sign/flux convention. Use it for verified manufactured equilibria and a simpler PDE existence milestone. Axisymmetric examples provide infrastructure and sanity checks, while the practical target remains a three-dimensional stellarator.
Weak and stepped-pressure equilibria
Define the static stress
For smooth divergence-free fields, div S=0 is equivalent to force balance. For piecewise smooth fields formulate div S=0 distributionally, div B=0 distributionally, and the resulting interface jumps. This prevents multiplication of undefined distributional currents by discontinuous fields without a specified interpretation.
For a multi-region relaxed-MHD model:
- decompose the toroidal domain into regions separated by magnetic interfaces;
- use constant pressure within each relaxed region;
- impose
curl B = λᵢ Bwithin each region; - impose interface force balance, flux and helicity/current constraints;
- permit islands and chaotic field lines within the regions.
The SPEC/MRxMHD paper supplies a candidate-generating formulation. Prove the appropriate existence and stability statements for that model; do not silently transfer them to smooth continuously nested ideal-MHD equilibrium.
Enciso–Luque–Peralta-Salas prove piecewise smooth nonconstant-pressure equilibria under nondegenerate toroidal-domain hypotheses. Extract their actual theorem, including the Beltrami/KAM assumptions. This is a substantial existing theorem to formalize, rather than an assertion that all nonaxisymmetric equilibria are unknown.
Smooth nonaxisymmetric equilibrium with a nonconstant pressure profile and a complete prescribed surface foliation raises small-divisor and resonance questions. VMEC/DESC representations impose nested surfaces; a converged finite representation alone is not an existence proof for a classical continuum solution. Research should target a specified class with constructive constants, allow weaker/stepped-pressure alternatives where appropriate, and account for obstructions. Constantin–Drivas–Ginsberg construct equilibria with a small additional force; that force must remain in their conclusion.
Beyond ideal MHD
Keep separate interfaces for:
- resistive Ohm law
E+u×B=η_e J, whereη_eis electrical resistivity, and induction with magnetic diffusivityη_e/μ₀; - generalized Ohm law with Hall, electron-pressure, and inertia terms;
- anisotropic stress
P=p_⊥ I+(p_∥-p_⊥)bb,b=B/|B|; - viscosity, heat conduction, sources, and losses;
- equilibrium flows and resistive walls.
In an isothermal/constant-resistivity incompressible toy model with closed boundaries, magnetic plus kinetic energy decreases through resistive and viscous dissipation. In a thermodynamically closed resistive model, Joule heating transfers electromagnetic energy into internal energy rather than destroying total energy. State which balance is being proved.
Static no-flow self-adjoint MHD stability machinery does not automatically apply to a flowing equilibrium or a dissipative nonself-adjoint operator.
Kinetic reference and reduction contracts
A multispecies nonrelativistic kinetic model is
with Maxwell equations and explicitly chosen collision/source operators. Specify decay or velocity boundaries so that moments and integration by parts are legitimate. Define ρ_c=Σqₛ∫fₛdv and J=Σqₛ∫vfₛdv.
Prove moment identities under collision conservation hypotheses. Closure of the pressure tensor and heat flux is an additional assumption or reduction theorem, not a consequence of taking moments alone.
A useful reduction contract has the form
for specified initial data, observables, parameters, and times. Plasma stability in a reduced model transfers only through such a contract and a sufficient robustness margin. Proving useful kinetic-to-fluid and orbit-reduction error bounds is part of the ambitious roadmap.
Theorem backlog
| ID | Target | Dependency / status | Progress so far |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Force balance implies tangency; force-free/vacuum distinction | Elementary existing theory | Lean verified — tangency; force-free slab; exact toroidal (Solov'ev) and helical finite-pressure equilibria satisfy the kernel ForceBalance law with actual Ampère current. |
| E2 | MHD conservation identities on smooth closed domains | Calculus, divergence theorem, ODE flow | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E3 | Grad–Shafranov equivalence and explicit examples | Cylindrical calculus | Partially implemented — an exact Solov'ev solution is verified directly against J×B=∇p (Δ*ψ=3R² checked by hand only); general Grad–Shafranov equivalence pending. A helical (JFKO-type) exact equilibrium is also verified. |
| E4 | Distributional stress and magnetic interface jump conditions | Weak derivatives and traces | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E5 | Validated equilibrium in a specified simpler PDE class | Contraction/inverse bounds, 05 | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E6 | Formalize a sourced piecewise smooth nonaxisymmetric existence theorem | Beltrami fields, KAM, analytic estimates | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E7 | Certified finite-pressure free-boundary equilibrium for external coils | Coupled interior/vacuum fields and interface | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E8 | Constructive smooth/weak equilibrium branches over useful uncertainty sets | Research target with specified admissible class | Planning only — no Lean code written |
| E9 | Quantified kinetic/fluid or resistive/ideal model comparison | Research target; singular limits and time horizon | Planning only — no Lean code written |